The distinction between fire tube boiler and water tube boiler should be possible on different focuses. These
Fire Tube Boiler versus Water Tube Boiler
Fire Tube Boiler
It is a heater in which the hot vent gases is available inside the cylinders and the water encompasses these cylinders. As flame is available inner parts the cylinders, subsequently it is called as flame tube heater.
The steam created by these boilers have weight of around 25 bar and that is the reason they fall under the class of low weight boilers.
The steam age rate in these boilers are low i.e. 9 tons for each hour.
For a given power the floor region required for steam age is more and it is around 8 m2 for each ton every hour.
The erection and transportation of these boilers are difficult. What’s more, this is on the grounds that their parts can’t be isolated.
In the event that we talk about the productivity, the general proficiency of flame tube boilers is about 75%.
The bearing of the water flow isn’t very much characterized i.e. a clear way isn’t accommodated the course of water.
The working expense of this evaporator is low.
The blasting shot is less. The blasting produces more serious hazard to the harm of the heater.
It isn’t reasonable for vast power plants yet utilized in little power plants.
Water Tube Boiler
It is a kettle in which the water is available inside the cylinders and the hot vent gases encompasses the cylinders. Since the water is available internal parts the cylinders consequently these boilers are called water tube evaporator.
High weight steam is created by these boilers. The weight of the steam is around 165 bar. These kettle falls under the class of high weight heater.
The steam age rate in water tube kettle is high i.e. 450 tons for every hour.
For a given power the floor territory required for the age of steam in this kettle is less i.e. 5 m2 for each ton every hour.
The erection and transportation is simple as its parts can be isolated.
The general proficiency of water tube kettle with economizer is upto 90%.
The bearing of the water course is very much characterized i.e. an unequivocal way is accommodated the flow of water.
The working expense is high.
The blasting possibility is high a direct result of its high steam weight. The blasting does not make any decimation the entire evaporator.
It is appropriate for the vast power plant.